Speaking Styles In Speech Research Paper

On By In 1
  • 1.

    Labov, W.: Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press (1973)Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Goldman-Eisler, F.: Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. Academic Press, London (1968)Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Eskenazi, M.: Trends in speaking styles research. In: EUROSPEECH 1993, PP. 501–509, Berlin (1993)Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Llisterri, J.: Speaking styles in speech research. In: ELSNET/ESCA/SALT Workshop on Integrating Speech and Natural Language, Dublin, Ireland (1992) Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Nakamura, M., Iwano, K., Furui, S.: Differences between acoustic characteristics of spontaneous and read speech and their effects on speech recognition performance. Computer Speech and Language 22, 171–184 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 6.

    Deshmukh, O.D., Kandhway, K., Verma, A., Audhkhasi, K.: Automatic evaluation of spoken English fluency. In: Proc. of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2009), Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 4829–4832 (2009)Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Biadsy, F., Hirschberg, J.: Using Prosody and Phonotactics in Arabic Dialect Identification. In: Proc. of Interspeech 2009, Brighton, UK (2009)Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Sanchez, M.H., Vergyri, D., Ferrer, L., Richey, C., Garcia, P., Knoth, B., Jarrold, W.: Using prosodic and spectral features in detecting depression in elderly males. In: Proc. of Interspeech, Florence, Italy, pp. 3001–3004 (2011)Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Veiga, A., Candeias, S., Lopes, C., Perdigão, F.: Characterization of hesitations using acoustic models. In: Proc. of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, pp. 2054–2057 (2011)Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Moniz, H., Trancoso, I., Mata, A.: Classification of disfluent phenomena as fluent communicative devices in specific prosodic contexts. In: Proc. of Interspeech 2009, Brighton, UK, pp. 1719–1722 (2009)Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Braga, D., Freitas, D., Teixeira, J.P., Barros, M.J., Latsh, V.: Back Close Non-Syllabic Vowel [u] Behavior in European Portuguese: Reduction or Suppression. In: Proc. of ICSP 2001 (International Conference in Speech Processing), Seoul (2001)Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Candeias, S., Perdigão, F.: A realização do schwa no Português Europeu. In: Proc. of the II Workshop on Portuguese Description-JDP, 8th Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology (STIL 2011), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil (2011)Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Barbosa, P., Viana, M., Trancoso, I.: Cross-variety Rhythm Typology in Portuguese. In: Proc. of Interspeech 2009, Brighton, UK (2009)Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Veiga, A., Candeias, S., Celorico, D., Proença, J., Perdigão, F.: Towards Automatic Classification of Speech Styles. In: Caseli, H., Villavicencio, A., Teixeira, A., Perdigão, F., et al. (eds.) PROPOR 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7243, pp. 421–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 15.

    Barras, C., Geoffrois, E., Wu, Z., Liberman, M.: Transcriber: a Free Tool for Segmenting, Labeling and Transcribing Speech. In: Proc. of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pp. 1373–1376 (1998)Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Delacourt, P., Wellekens, C.J.: DISTBIC: A speaker-based segmentation for audio data indexing. Speech Communication 32, 111–126 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 17.

    Boersma, P., Weenink, D.: Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05), Computer program (retrieved May 1, 2009)Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Platt, J.: Sequential Minimal Optimization: A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines. Microsoft Research, MSRTR-98-14 (1998)Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations 11 (2009)Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Reynold, D.A., Quatieri, T.F., Dunn, R.B.: Speaker Verification Using Adapted Gaussian Mixture Models. Digital Signal Processing 10, 19–41 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 21.

    Akbacak, M., Hansen, J.H.L.: Environmental Sniffing: Noise Knowledge Estimation for Robust Speech Systems. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 15(2), 465–477 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 22.

    Lopes, C., Veiga, A., Perdigão, F.: Using Fingerprinting to Aid Audio Segmentation. In: Proc. of the VI Jornadas en Tecnología del Habla and II Iberian SLTech Workshop, FALA 2010, Vigo (2010)Google Scholar

  • “Langue” is the systematic and social part of “langage” while “parole” is its unpatterned and individual aspect. This Saussurean tenet was objected by sociolinguists insofar as they uncovered the patterned rule-governed character of speech, understood as a social event (Hymes, 1962; Gumperz, 1970, 1971), and insofar as they showed up a methodological contradiction known as the “Saussurean paradox” (Labov, 1970, 1972). These authors furnished some notions in order to approach socio-symbolic speech variation: that of “ways of speaking”, “natural varieties” and “styles”, respectively. The former (Hymes-Gumperz's) approach displaces the object of description from speech itself towards interaction and the communicative event. The latter (Labov's) holds a contextualized view of speech and looks for meaningful correlations between sound pattern features and independently defined macrosociological variables. The former is to be preferred when studying social behaviour patterns; the latter may be more suited to defining styles inherently. The notion of a sociolinguistic variable allows us to define them as specific co-occurrence patterns of variables. While some sociolinguists concentrate on the analysis of segmental variables, phoneticians concerned with speaking styles emphasize suprasegmental variables. It is suggested that this difference in approach may reflect a difference in the social meaning conveyed by variables. Beyond description, it is proposed the search for an explanatory principle of style variation in terms of adaptive variability.

    0 comments

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *